Search for: All records

As thirteen leaders in research with Alaska Native communities, we came together in a workshop to self-define the role of boundary spanners within our cross-cultural contexts. We utilized convergence methods and participatory decision-making facilitation. Reflecting on chronic challenges and current issues of trying to do co-production of knowledge, our group discussed the boundary spanner role and how to create systemic change. We represented different career stages, gender identities, Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples, ages, backgrounds, and job positions. We wrote this paper to illustrate positive and negative aspects of this role as framed in a typical career journey. The role is often not sustainable, includes a degree of conflict and lacks support. We recognize that boundary spanners can act as enablers of boundaries. Healing is often interwoven with Indigenous and individual self-determination. Our workshop ended with the development of strategies to create systemic change through mentoring the next generation and addressing funding inequity and the cultural divide between communities and science/policy. A key concept from the workshop is the rejection of the term “boundary spanner,” because ideally, there should not be one individual doing the spanning duties, but everyone within the science/policy sphere working to dismantle boundaries. 

Pacific walruses ( Odobenus rosmarus divergens, Illiger 1815) have long been vital to Indigenous communities along Alaska’s west coast. Although current harvest rates are sustainable, climate change and increased industrial activity in the range of this species pose threats to the population and to hunting safety and success. To gather information relevant to addressing these concerns, the Eskimo Walrus Commission and the US Fish and Wildlife Service held a workshop in August 2023 in Nome, Alaska, with experienced Yupik walrus hunters from the communities of Gambell and Savoonga on St. Lawrence Island, Alaska, and Federal walrus biologists. The 3-day event documented extensive information about walrus biology and behavior, which was used to improve a walrus population model. Workshop discussions also addressed concepts of sustainability and the future of walrus hunting. The workshop benefitted from prior collaboration between the biologists and some of the hunters on a walrus research cruise in the Chukchi Sea earlier the same summer, creating a foundation of common experience and interpersonal relationships. In the longer term, the workshop helped demonstrate the value of equitable collaboration towards shared goals, in part by allowing for open conversations rather than, for example, an extended question-and-answer session regarding model parameters. 

Food, energy, and water (FEW) security require adequate quantities and forms of each resource, conditions that are threatened by climate change and other factors. Assessing FEW security is important, and needs to be understood in the context of multiple factors. Existing frameworks make it hard to disentangle the contributors to FEW insecurity and to determine where best to expend efforts on short- and long-term solutions. We identified four consistent components of FEW security (availability, access, preference, quality). This framework provides detailed and nuanced insights into factors that limit or bolster security in each of the three sectors. The integrated framework identifies proximate and ultimate underlying causes of deficiencies in each security component providing opportunities to identify short- and long-term solutions.